assets to meet their living expenses ($42,000) coupled with
age pension entitlements until over age 100
Linda replies
Hi John
Very interested to hear the plan and how it could be achieved
And previously
Are the smileys a good sign?????
Yes it comes down to the numbers & the
emotions when are you going to retire?
Linda is not 65 & yet to reach age pension age so that
means for her that she can’t get the pension.
However her husband can as over 65.
We are arguing that because of prospective changes to
calculating how much age pension you might be granted then it may be smart to retire before the end of the 2014.
The prospective changes mean that your super when in pension
form will be subject to the harsher
asset test as well as the income test.
Simply the test which means the government pays you least
means that is what is granted to you.
Let’s give a
simple e.g. of $350,000 only in financial investments & outside the home.
How the income test works
Financial assets are deemed to earn
income, while there are different assessment rules for other types of income.
Couple combined, illness separated (couple combined)
Fortnightly
income
|
up to $276
|
over $276
|
Reduction in
payment
|
none – full payment
|
50 cents for each dollar over $276 (combined)
|
if you are a member of a couple:
- if at least 1 of you is getting a pension, the first $77,400 of your and your partner's financial investments is deemed to earn income at 2% per annum and any amount over that is deemed to earn income at 3.5% per annum,
i.e. in our example deemed to earn $11,089 p.a. or $426.50p.f.
& so the reduction
in pension is $75.25 p.f.
However under the assets test limits for allowances and full pensions
Family
situation
|
For home-owners
assets must be less than |
|
Couple (combined)
|
$279,000
|
The full pension is
reduced by $1.50 p.f for each $1,000
exceeding this
i.e. in our example of $350,000 full pension reduced by $106.50.
However if actioned
before 1st January 2015 & if in receipt of a certain government
benefits then there are ‘grandfather’ rules.
Linda had some concerns.
·
Does that
mean we should reduce our salary sacrificing currently to the maximum that they
can?
·
Should we
start giving away called gifting to
our son & grandchildren?
·
What about
the health card as Linda currently spends 120p.m. on medication?
·
How will
we be able to afford our health insurance?
Do you want to & can you live only on the pension?
i.e.
Pension rates (per fortnight)
|
Single
|
Couple each
|
Couple
combined
|
|
Maximum basic rate
|
$766.00
|
$577.40
|
$1,154.80
|
|
Yes
you could but
‘The
latest quarterly ASFA retirement standard report - published by the Association
of Superannuation Funds of Australia and released this month - estimates that a “comfortable” standard of living
would cost a single person $42,254 a year or a couple, $57,817.
By contrast, the researchers
calculate that a “modest” standard of
living would cost a single person $23,283 a year or a couple, $33,509. ‘
There are other ideas worth considering
- · gifting which means you can give away 30,000 over a 5 year period.
- · Funeral bonds as they become exempt assets & solve a problem that funeral cover attempts to solve.
- · Constructing your portfolio so that some of it may better qualify under Centrelink assets & income tests.
As we said to Harry
yesterday
‘If we were in your position what would we do so that you are better of
in three years time’.
In Linda’s case she is better off to retire today & also
make use of the long service leave they both have. To emphasise this
I have attached the
retirement planning correspondence and modelling results as discussed.
Based on their current assets if they were to retire as at 1 July 2014
they would have sufficient assets to meet their living expenses ($42,000)
coupled with age pension entitlements until over age 100. I have also
attached more in-depth landscape document with cashflow and asset values over
time. Please note that these calculations will vary based on future draw downs as well as any further assets/income which would need to be assessed
for Centrelink purposes that have not been included in these
calculations.
Linda it is time to visit the caravan &
camping show & to learn how to back the caravan.
We also argue that asset
values will fall from now & January 2015 as part pensioners find in
particular that their rental property doesn’t provide adequate Net returns
& penalises them under the asset test.
John
McAuliffe
0 comments:
Post a Comment