Yes, that was the question during the school drop off run


Yes, that was the question during the school drop off run.

We all know what it means. If you have an accident at work or on the roads or maybe the shopping mall then you need to blame someone.

What was that phone number & yes it’s on the TV so let’s call them.

crows on a wire’ was a term Andrew used on Sky Business today.

No doubt they do a ‘fact find’ to ascertain whether they are a chance of winning a lump sum probably from an insurance company.

Our answer as we do ½ hour maths every night included ‘what is 30% of say 50,000 = ?’

The challenge is how to you meet your commitments before the payout?

As clients have told us they had to wait eight years.

Where to you get those funds in the meantime & the stress & no doubt the medical bills that go with it.

Let’s remember these claims are for accidents only.

What happens if you have a stroke?

What happens to your future credit rating if you are unable due to disability meet your Commitments?

We heard at our latest Professional development day that it is the stroke or the cancer or the trauma or the critical illness that the insurance companies make the least on.

i.e. they pay out most in trauma claims &  hence you might consider such cover first.

What is the solution?

It is to have your plan for the downside.

Remember as our Young travel agent said ‘if you can’t afford the insurance you can’t afford the trip’.

A premium is always less than the alternatives which could be the loss of your current lifestyle or your assets & certainly your ‘peace of mind’

 

Where do you go?

Yes you can shop online & go directly to the insurance company & not even get off the couch.

Then what happens?

Here is what a company that does both direct & also uses advisers had to say at our PD day.

·         Rates for Direct i.e. directly to a company, life insurance can be up to 200% more & on average 40% more.

·         Direct is designed to accept the easy ‘clean skin’ applications & decline most others.

·         Suicide & other pre-existing conditions have exclusions for up to 5 years.

·         Dangerous pastimes & occupations are excluded for the life of the policy.

·         It is at claim time that the 40 questions which weren’t asked on application are now asked.

·         Claim payments are less than 50%.

·         45% of income & trauma covers are underwritten at claim time.

·         Higher nondisclosure by applicants. What does that mean?

·         Limited cover & reduces with age. When are you more likely if not probably going to need the cover?

Good luck.

But with a non aligned  adviser you get

o   Help during the claims process

o   The adviser knows what cover you have

o   The adviser know the client & hence goes the extra mile

o   The adviser is on your case if you change bank accounts, change address or miss a premium.

o   He wants that cover in force when you need it.

o   We provide the help you want when you want it

o   When do you want to answer the 40 questions? Now or at claim time?

o   We provide a tailor plan within your agreed budget for your needs.

o   We probably do it for less.

 

Let us think about that.

We do have also some ideas on estate planning that a contemporary wrote due to his own personal tragedy.

You can Call on 3848 1088 or Email is for those ideas as it could help those who you care for & who care for you. Discover our website.

We will have other ideas for you when we lunch here.

Remember it takes 20,000 hours to master your trade.

As we said to Mary today ‘we do for you what we would do for ourselves if we were in your financial & personal position.’

Isn’t that what you would want us to do for you?

John McAuliffe

How much would a savings of 10% for life on your health insurance be worth to you?


We have asked our clients over their recent strategic updates how much do they pay for health insurance?

For a family generally it is more than 300p.m. which is 3,600+p.a.

As that isn’t going to decrease in our lifetime then you will pay a serious amount for your health insurance.

We reminded Mary this week that

we do for everyone what we would do for them if we were in the same financial position that they are. That means that in three years time they should be better off than they would be otherwise’.

Some time ago we reviewed our own health insurance for the family.

As our life expectancy is 29 years then we could expect a savings of 10% of 3,600+ X 29 = 10,440+

That was our reasoning & it’s those little tune ups that need to be done when other costs keep increasing.

Yes we could have sorted through the long list of health insurers but every policy is different.

So we switched companies solely on a similar cover with a say 10,000 lifetime savings.

The company is big & with 172 years of history & ‘We are a diversified group of businesses offering healthcare, financial services and retirement solutions to more than 620,000 customers, including 320,000 members nationwide. We employ around 1,700 staff in various locations across Victoria, New South Wales, South Australia and Queensland’.

That is good enough for us.

Our offer to you is simple.

If you want to make this sort of 10,000+ lifetime savings then call us on 07 3848 1088 or email us today.

We suggest you have your current cover handy so as you can compare the two.

We need to send to you  a health referral brochure & collect a few basic details to pass onto the insurer.

We will do this on the receipt of a once only referral fee of our hourly rate.

We believe that is a good deal for you as this is what we have done for ourselves & yes it is only for this company.

Here to help you with this idea or the many others that we might have for you.

 

John McAuliffe

What does ‘no win no fee’ mean?


Yes, that was the question during the school drop off run.

We all know what it means. If you have an accident at work or on the roads or maybe the shopping mall then you need to blame someone.

What was that phone number & yes it’s on the TV so let’s call them.

crows on a wire’ was a term Andrew used on Sky Business today.

No doubt they do a ‘fact find’ to ascertain whether they are a chance of winning a lump sum probably from an insurance company.

Our answer as we do ½ hour maths every night included ‘what is 30% of say 50,000 = ?’

The challenge is how to you meet your commitments before the payout?

As clients have told us they had to wait eight years.

Where to you get those funds in the meantime & the stress & no doubt the medical bills that go with it.

Let’s remember these claims are for accidents only.

What happens if you have a stroke?

What happens to your future credit rating if you are unable due to disability meet your Commitments?

We heard at our latest Professional development day that it is the stroke or the cancer or the trauma or the critical illness that the insurance companies make the least on.

i.e. they pay out most in trauma claims &  hence you might consider such cover first.

What is the solution?

It is to have your plan for the downside.

Remember as our Young travel agent said ‘if you can’t afford the insurance you can’t afford the trip’.

A premium is always less than the alternatives which could be the loss of your current lifestyle or your assets & certainly your ‘peace of mind’

 Where do you go?

Yes you can shop online & go directly to the insurance company & not even get off the couch.

Then what happens?

Here is what a company that does both direct & also uses advisers had to say at our PD day.

·         Rates for Direct i.e. directly to a company, life insurance can be up to 200% more & on average 40% more.

·         Direct is designed to accept the easy ‘clean skin’ applications & decline most others.

·         Suicide & other pre-existing conditions have exclusions for up to 5 years.

·         Dangerous pastimes & occupations are excluded for the life of the policy.

·         It is at claim time that the 40 questions which weren’t asked on application are now asked.

·         Claim payments are less than 50%.

·         45% of income & trauma covers are underwritten at claim time.

·         Higher nondisclosure by applicants. What does that mean?

·         Limited cover & reduces with age. When are you more likely if not probably going to need the cover?

Good luck.

But with a non aligned  adviser you get

o   Help during the claims process

o   The adviser knows what cover you have

o   The adviser know the client & hence goes the extra mile

o   The adviser is on your case if you change bank accounts, change address or miss a premium.

o   He wants that cover in force when you need it.

o   We provide the help you want when you want it

o   When do you want to answer the 40 questions? Now or at claim time?

o   We provide a tailor plan within your agreed budget for your needs.

o   We probably do it for less.

 
Let us think about that.

We do have also some ideas on estate planning that a contemporary wrote due to his own personal tragedy.

You can Call on 3848 1088 or Email is for those ideas as it could help those who you care for & who care for you. Discover our website.

We will have other ideas for you when we lunch here.

Remember it takes 20,000 hours to master your trade.

As we said to Mary today ‘we do for you what we would do for ourselves if we were in your financial & personal position.’

Isn’t that what you would want us to do for you?

John McAuliffe

We estimate you will pay $310,678 income taxx over this period


We estimate you will pay $310,678 income taxx over this period.

 
·         Under the recommended strategy we estimate you would pay income tax of $270,387 a saving of $22,740. 

 
·         By implementing the new strategy your income tax will reduce from $34,350 to $28,382 this year and your position will improve.

 ·         Based on the information provided, the assumptions used and the current income tax rates the recommended strategy should increase your current position at retirement to providing a lump sum at 65 of $661,650

 
·         From our discussions using your spending habits of last year you estimated the cost of living in retirement would be $80,400 in today's dollars, which would equate to $101,848 based on the pre-retirement cost of living indexation.  Post retirement indexation of the cost of living has been assumed at 3 %.

 

These are excerpts from a report that we prepared for Douglas recently.

 Very briefly he is 57 & earns 100k with an extra income from a portfolio.

 He estimates he might work to age 65 & his house close to paid off.

 If his super is 341,000 today & grows to 661,650 when he is 65 then is that sufficient to allow him to maintain his Merck & his lifestyle?

 Not when his projected lifestyle will be 101,848 p.a.?
 

Douglas needs to do something & there are two simple strategies available to reduce his taxx & top up his retirement capital amount.

 
We can also do better than these above projections as when Douglas turns 60 he can do more of the same. He will need to do his biannual reviews with us to maximise his options as 661,550 won’t support his preferred lifestyle.


However there is no simple way to reduce his current spending lifestyle from 82K unless he has parameters which we & the government set him.

 Again it is a choice of spending today or deferring & saving so as to spend later.

 

We had three conversations with others recently & these conversations were all similar as they were all concerned with FIFO miners.

 
Their financial numbers were all the same as they were each earning 140k to 150k income this financial year.

 1.    Our hairdresser this week indicated that her husband had paid about 15,000 in taxx for the quarter of the year he had been working.

 How much is that for the year we had to ask?
 
About 50,000 she says
 
             No, your son would say 60,000..

 How much is that over the next 25 years if he keeps earning that income?

You can do that, can’t you???
 

Then we moved onto the size of the mortgage which after serious prompting is about 440,000?

 Will they pay off the house before he retires or is made redundant?

 
What was her accountant’s suggestion when he was showing her is new Audi?

  It was maybe buy a car.

 Our suggestion was to sack the accountant’ as his fees are clearly to high & his answer wasnt good enough.?

 Our other suggestion was if she had some equity & a certain risk profile then maybe she could switch over time their debt into a taxx deduction.
 
How do you do that?
 
 Of course what if she jams her finger or worse how do they pay the meals & the mortgage?

 
 
2.    Mark we spoke to just as he was to board the plane.

 How much taxx was he going to pay this year?

What had he done about it?

He had bought a new car.

Is that wealth creation?

 We did give him a suggestion as he boarded as he is a client as he has made some steps in protecting the downside for his family.

 
Will they pay off the house before he retires or is made redundant?

 

3.    Another called us as he enjoyed what we wrote.

He also was on the same high income. He plans to buy a cheap house as he lives west of here but close enough to lunch here.

He has had challenges in the past with business partners & still has a 40k debt with the taxx office.

Surely that should motivate him enough to do some EOFY planning so that he is in a better financial position in three years time.

 
He had meet some so called adviser who suggested she could organise finance with only a 15% deposit. That is better that 5% or 10% but still requires mortgage insurance.

 It doesn’t  minimise his taxx or maximise his earning or protect his family.
 
We repeated our 5 house buying rules from a previous new letter.
 
What does he need to do so that in three years time he is in a better financial position?

 
Then we read this weekend.
 


 

These three & the other 55,000 may well regret not maximising their income whilst they had the opportunity.

 They certainly could have paid down their debt with some discipline, minimised government waste & build up liquid reserves for later.

 

 As we have indicated to all & in previous newsletters our parameters are

 ·         What would we do for you if we were in the same financial position as you?

·         How can we do this efficiently to minimise waste to others lifestyle?

 

We are not aligned to anyone but you & just as Greg tunes up our car every 5000 KM, isn’t it time you tuned up your finances? It costs NOT to.

 

  How much government waste will you pay over a lifetime & are you prepared for a redundancy?

 You are welcome to call us on 07 3848 1088 or email or visit our websites  

  How do we motivate you  enough to do some EOFY planning today so that you are in a better financial position in three years time.

 
          John McAuliffe

 

How you could save $135,772 in Capital &


How you could save $135,772 in Capital.

Probably the most important table you need to consider .

Modest lifestyle
single p.w.
Modest lifestyle
couple p.w.
Comfortable lifestyle
– single p.w.
Comfortable lifestyle
 couple
p.w.
Housing – ongoing only
$60.65
$58.22
$70.30
$81.49
Energy
$40.48
$53.77
$41.08
$55.72
Food
$74.90
$155.15
$107.00
$192.60
Clothing
$18.05
$29.30
$39.06
$58.60
Household goods and services
$26.44
$35.85
$74.38
$87.14
Health
$37.28
$71.95
$73.97
$130.55
Transport
$93.36
$96.01
$139.13
$141.77
Leisure
$71.76
$106.91
$217.46
$298.00
Communications
$9.33
$16.33
$25.64
$32.64
Total per week
$432.26
$623.49
$788.02
$1,078.50
Total per year
$22,539
$32,511
$41,090
$56,236

 

The ASFA Retirement Standard benchmarks the annual budget needed by Australians to fund either a comfortable or modest standard of living in the post-work years. It is updated quarterly to reflect inflation, and provides detailed budgets of what singles and couples would need to spend to support their chosen lifestyle.

According to the latest data for September 2012, in general, a couple looking to achieve a comfortable retirement needs to spend $56,236 a year, while those seeking a ‘modest’ retirement lifestyle need to spend $32,511 a year.

The full article on this we have but unfortunately not the link from the Courier Mail 2/5/13

& hence you are welcome to email us for it.

So we have some choices i.e. do we want to be comfortable or better on retirement & when do we want to retire.

The Capital required depends on the interest rate available & how long do we live & do we draw down the principle.

Simply if you want to be comfortable & rates are 5% [which is not today] then the capital you require is 1,124,720+. If you draw down on principal then the article suggests  a capital sum  of 900,000 at age 60 or 780,000  at age 65.

In every case the capital required to retire on is MUCH More  that the house that we live in.

However what does Mum suggest we do. ‘Settle down & buy a house’.

We would agree with that if you follow the basic guidelines which are

·         Is it cheaper to buy than rent?

·         Will this be your last house?

·         Where are you sending the kids to school?

·         Do you have a 30% deposit?

·         Are you ‘handy’?

Surely the larger capital sum needs more time as more important. Hence we suggest that a house might be deferred although we certainly agree that a family needs a home.

We are all sucked in by the big boys who lie & we need to re-examine our concepts & priorities.

Let’s look at the table & examine where you could make a serious saving.

The article says The seniors’ healthcare card ensures that the cost of the drugs she uses don’t eat up her remaining savings. (Our refrigerator does look like a pharmacy.)

i.e. your future health bill could be on average 130.55p.w. or 6,789p.a. which suggests $135,772 in capital is required to fund your health needs.

We need convincing that the health system will actually look after you in your later years. We believe that it looks after itself, is avaricious & simply doesn’t solve your future medical condition.

George wants to know today that there may be a better solution than morphine for his back pain. There are too many vested big boys & we aren’t dopes.

What has worked for us for 15 years & our family & 600 top athletes & the WTA girls has been on the prevention side. Our top clients agree with us. Nobody even wants the flu  especially an employer or the self employed & we know that no one gives you your due respect when you are either poor or unhealthy.

 Nobody wants to use their insurance which is a lot dearer than our  alternative suggestion. It won’t get cheaper & the 30% rebate is reducing by stealth.

As ‘Gerald’ a radiologist client said years ago ‘if everyone was on these he would be out of a job’.

Ok we are not qualified in the medical business but  we probably can race you up our drive.

Our proposition for you is

·         If we were in your position what would we do?

·         Is there a more efficient way for you?

If you want to maximise your dollar then health is certainly one way for you to do so.

Why not request our comparative guide to indicate one company that maybe able to help you.

Maybe you could use a personalised health assessment available on its site normally valued @$55.

It only takes 15 minutes to complete.
You will receive details of your top health risks, a customised health and lifestyle plan  and a nutrition recommendation for you. Most people find these reports invaluable.  
 
If you would like to spend more on travel & less on health either today or later then we can introduce you so that you are healthier. Hence fewer money worries. It is as Myrna wrote on ‘peeling the onion’ today ‘a core belief’ of hers & ours.

You might need more capital as you might live longer. Yes they do cost you 10+p.w. each.
Wwe haven’t factored in that capital cost.

Of course as it is  nearly June 30 you might want a financial efficiency examination.
You are welcome to call on 07 3848 1088 or email or visit our websites.

We have various EOFY strategies for you. We may have a better way to maximise your dollar.

 

John McAuliffe