Does Nan sell the house?


Yes this is the question we all face when Nan has reached the age & she admits that an aged care facility is really where she needs to be. 

If Nan is assessed by ACAT as ‘low care’ or high care with extra services’ then an accommodation bond will need to be paid.

Recall that the accommodation bond depends on the facility & is charged if Nan has assets over 41,500 currently. It can be a large say 350K on average but we recently attended a talk by the Minister who mentioned a bond of 2.1m.

If Nan moves to a hostel or nursing home the decision to sell or keep Nan’s home can affect how much age pension Nan receive as well as the daily care fees Nan will pay. Overall this impacts Nan’s total net income.

How can the bond be funded when it is sizable say 400k on average & Nan doesn’t have the funds.

Recall that a facility doesn’t have to take Nan as any agreement is mutual. You may find a facility to place Nan is not easy to find.

 Also recall that the house counts as an asset under aged care assessment  and hence the accommodation bond [or charge if high care]. [We will assume that Pop has passed on.]

 

1.       If Nan sells her home, the money Nan receives will be assessed depending on how it is used.

If Nan sells the house & has money left over after the accommodation bond is paid  then as Nan like most is on some part pension then her pension may be affected as she may be earning more than in the past.

If Nan as usually the case places the surplus funds  into cash at the bank then these will have deemed rates of return.  Nan’s pension income reduces if she earns more than 152p.f. or she has assets over 332K as a non home owner. This adds up if as on average Nan ticks on for 5 years.

 

How does Nan pay the accommodation bond?

The accommodation bond can be paid as: a lump sum or periodic payments1 or a combination of the two.

A facility can deduct a retention amount on a monthly basis of up to a maximum of $3,876 p.a. for up to five years (depending upon the amount of the bond shown in the following table). The retention amount does not alter during the five-year period.

Bond amount
Maximum annual retention amount
Less than $20,040
$2,004 per annum
Between $38,760 and $20,040
The maximum is calculated by multiplying the bond by 10 per cent
$38,760 or above
$3,876 per annum

The Remaining bond must be refunded within 14 days if a resident passes away or leaves the accommodation.

If transferred to another care facility, the bond may be transferred and the resident should not have to pay an additional bond in a low care facility (such as a hostel) or an accommodation charge for a high care facility (such as a nursing home).

 ¹ If the periodic payment method is chosen, a facility can charge a maximum interest rate of 7.24 per cent effective from 1 January 2013 to 19 March 2013. The interest rate is fixed upon the date of entry into the aged care facility.

2.       In many cases the family or Nan want to keep the house & pass it onto the family. They forget that in many cases the family have their own home & mortgage & that selling the house after Nan passes on is what will happen.  As often said ‘where there is a will there is a relative’& any lump sum is appreciated for the mortgage or the school fees or hot air ballooning.

 If Nan keeps the house then Nan must meet 2 of these 3 parameters.

·         Not pay the bond in full & Nan must pay interest on the outstanding amount by periodic payments

·         Pay an accommodation charge which is if Nan is in High care.

·         Rent out the former home.

This option has Centrelink exemptions such as rent & asset test but will be assessable by ATO.

Lets also not forget that house maintenance is 1%to 2% of house value p.a. & net income returns are often bettered elsewhere.

For Nan & the family this is an emotional time & we must not forget that Nan is the client. Hence what is best for her must be the overriding consideration.

As we explained an accommodation bond  to Les, a not so retiring retired accountant he immediately concluded  so the bond doesn’t count as an asset’. [For Centrelink purposes.]

Exactly Les.

This is one reason why a resident paid $2.1m for a bond last year.

 It is a reason why the government is bringing in rule changes from July 2014 under the banner

Living Longer. Living Better. It includes limiting the size of bonds & as often the case what is good for them is not good for you.

 As can be seen Nan has both Centrelink & aged care assessments & they are very different. We haven’t brought in the daily charges  & other charges that are charged daily as that is for next time.

It is only government with brigades of employees who could make this decision for Nan to sell so complicated. You can read all @ Department of health & Aging.

 

John McAuliffe

How to earn $ 163,000 in one week?


How to earn $ 163,000 in one week?
Yes, we cycled across to the tennis last week & that was what Serena earned for the Brisbane International tennis. Not a bad week’s income considering that she didn’t have to play the world Number 1 ‘Queen Victoria’ who forfeited the match due to pedicure misadventure.
Yes a good week’s ‘Gross’ income [it is a business & businesses have costs] & how did she get to that income & standard.
Let’s not forget the taxx she has to pay & as Peter reminded us this week
The two enemies of the people are criminals and
government, so let us tie the second down with the
chains of the Constitution so the second will not
become the legalized version of the first
.
                             --  Thomas Jefferson  --
We also read of Gerard who has moved from France to Russia. He reckons he has paid 148M in taxx & now has decided to be unpatriotic. It appears Russia is less Socialist.
We probably have all seen her Dad Richard sitting in the stands[most recently away from Mum]. We have heard how her & Venus learnt to play in gangland LA with Richard doing what Dads & coaches do to motivate & encourage & assist their daughters & charges to progress in their sport or trade or vocation.
We recall Martina with her Mum, Steffi with her father & Maria with her father all achieving great incomes through guidance & hours of coaching.
Yes all the girls & all the players have coaches to help them move higher up the ratings & with that means higher incomes.
We saw a TV flash with Serena practicing simple repetitive back cross court shots with her current coach. There is continual work to maintain & improve.
The WTA also allow the girls to request their coaches for advice during play. We know that all helps as ‘in the trenches’ all you see is ‘the fog of war’. You need help & a view from afar.
As the girls health is so important then they have a major sponsor which you might note on the bill boards the maker of the Number 1 supplements on the planet. As Gerald, a radiologist, said to us 10 years ago “if everyone was on these then he would be out of a job’.
Then on Sunday we over heard a certain cricketerhaving it easy’. We will bet & he likes to do so that he practiced for hours during his teens & playing days & teams these days have coaches for every facet. Why did Australia do well bowling last year again the English. P. Siddle with a hat trick. They had a coach Craig who has been there & done that.
We observe that currently many of the cricket test teams have South African coaches which makes sense when RSA is no 1.
The same with finances. We had friends over & he said that he couldn’t control his wife’s spending.  That is really simple, ‘give her a monthly budget & a limit on the credit card’ & its ‘sausages or steak’ depending on the time of the month. Ideally cut up the card.
That is what the USA needs to do when 47% are on government support & 16 trillion in debt. It is in fact the debt that is summarised by a recent email to us that may bankrupt the US although some Rep. Rep said this week we won’t default. Yeah right.
The minting of a trillion dollar coin & depositing with the Federal Reserve is one way suggested.
Are you serious? The USA could use Al Gore’s help & wealth. Maybe too many drones in the sky.
 However the USA is uncoachable & we only help those who are coachable & have control of their debts.
As we discussed with William on Wednesday ‘debt is like tattoos & weight, easy to get but hard to remove .
[ William had just returned from a cruise & he was appalled at the gross weight of passengers &  others with too many tatts].  Winners achieve through self discipline & there is ‘no free lunch’. Our contempories at the tennis weren’t obese & we suspect could generally play tennis to a standard.
Joe a builder, was here recently & his contemplating moving to self employment as with Mr. Cricket he has tired of being away from home & family. There are steps to make as he makes this move.  He should of course write a business plan as all buildings need a plan drawn up by a draughtsman or an architect.
All  buildings should have some Foundations & insurance & hence we used our free calculator to estimate the deductible premiums with Joe.
Our credit union headlined ‘Who paid out $3.9 billion in 2011 & it wasn’t the lotteries?’
Yep an average of $15.9 million was paid to 251 Australians every working day for life insurance claims.
 As Victoria found, missing ‘work’ through injury might mean a large drop in income [163K]& meals & mortgages & leases & costs still need to be paid.
Joe is also aware that he needs a business vehicle & using his own cash isn’t ideal as trucks depreciate & his own cash would be better off paying down his 250K mortgage. Will Joe have that debt paid off before he retires & unless he actions the above idea then it won’t happen.
We could bet on that given our observations over 28 years. Joe needs a financial coach or builder as he needs to have no debt & 1 million in the bank or his business to enjoy his grandchildren. We do have actionable ideas for Joe.
Joe has a family & needs much more cover than is the union fund provides & we have found their clauses to be interesting.
We loaned Elizabeth ‘Rich Dad Poor Dad’ to understand that homes are not assets as they don’t provide an income. We suggested to her not to sell her rental properties due to the high costs 20K Elizabeth has already paid & a similar amount if she was to sell. Rather pay down the debt so she has income from it when she retires in 16 years.  
We also remodeled her superannuation  at a lower cost with more options including direct shares.
Invest like a cockroach’ if your wealth is to survive.
We might observe that generally it is Dads & their expectations & advice that helped Serena & others to have  higher incomes & no debts. Mums usually suggest buy a house & settle down.
Where would that get the WTA girls?
 correct us  if we are wrong”. Whoooops ‘tiger Mums”
If you wish then you are welcome to call on 3848 1088 or email or visit our websites to plan & financially progress over 2013. Unless things change then nothing changes.
Maybe check out this chart. Maybe we can save you 15% in taxx. Lets do.
How much will the Aussies, Atomic Bernard, Sam, John Millman & others win in Melbourne?
John McAuliffe
 
 
 
 

 

 

We wish you many happy family Moments at Christmas & a prosperous 2013


We wish you many happy family Moments at Christmas  & a prosperous 2013

 
Here is an opportunity for your house to cool down before you flake.

 

Just type in your address or any family addresses and look through the window at the snow falling on your home today.


 May your Christmas stocking be filled with toys such as these.

 

 or at least hope for the future.

 
You are welcome to call in for our unique Christmas cakes.

 
John   McAuliffe

John, Can you review my 1,000,000 portfolio?


John, Can you review my 1,000,000 portfolio?

Yes that was the request from Peter this week. The portfolio was 100% cash in one  bank which was offering above market rates to its  ‘Retention’ clients.

It was certainly  easy to agree with Peter that he appeared to be doing the right thing earning top interest.

We had a few initial thought bubbles.

What if interest rates fall further & Peter may have to come out of ‘hibernation’ & work to increase his income. Of course this is why Peter called us in the first place.

The government guarantee for bank deposits is only on the 1st 250,000 per institution & hence it might be wise to deposit into say 5 different institutions.  Some cash under the mattress would be a suggestion although it doesn’t earn interest & Penny doesn’t like it.

{We read today a comparison between Iceland which did not support the banks & supported the tax payers & of Ireland which guaranteed the banks & hence not the taxpayers. Who is better off now?}

We also mentioned that because everyone including government wants his money then maybe a trust for protection  might be considered. However  he had closed his trust to simplify his life.

Peter is comfortable now so he says but his income has dropped over the year. Yes cash preserves your capital but it doesn’t preserve your income.

If Peter’s interest income has dropped  from earning 6% to 5 % then he has dropped 17% in income. If he was to diversify banks today he might get only 4.5%. That’s a 25% drop in income.

 No wonder Peter questioned Black Duck’s good news for Christmas. We heard similar questions to the Federal minister for Aging a month ago.

Today we read of lowest confidence readings & hence rates might be decreased further in February.

 i.e. anyone who needs interest income to support their needs, needs interest rates up.

Peter also pays taxx say 7,800p.a. or 650p.m. on his income which also reduces his lifestyle. This could be tuned up but requires further answering the what ifs?

No wonder Peter is in hibernation. However when he remerges then he may find he has acted too late.

What is a solution to Peter’s problem. He certainly can survive & remain as he is if rates don’t change.

However the only constant is change.

 If they go up then yes maybe he will manage. But higher rates are usually to contain inflation which means he is losing purchasing power by sitting on his hands. We are all very aware that governments  globally are attempting to inflate their way out of debt. Our power bill has increased to the extent we will have to share showers again.

Peter who travels for up to 3 months in the USA & a month in China is very aware that costs there are a third of what they are here. Why is this so?

If rates go down & they have been down in Japan for 20 years & are currently the lowest for 500 years in the UK & the lowest in 100 years for the USA then Peter really will be on struggle street. It may mean reduced prices of course.  Peter might then need to live abroad.

John Murray from Perennial  sent this now.

Honey Where's My Income? 
As expected the RBA dropped rates by another 0.25% and the banks kept a little, with mortgage rates only declining by 0.20%. Non-mortgage holders are not rejoicing, with term deposits falling to well under 5.0%.

So where to go to get income? The NAB provides an interesting example – you can invest in a term deposit at 4.40% or go up the risk scale and buy its listed income securities, currently yielding 6.33% but with a capital value determined by the stock market. Alternatively, an investor could look at buying NAB shares – a much riskier proposition, but with an attractive, high grossed up dividend yield. The dilemma for investors in terms of yield is illustrated by the following table.
 
 
Credit Rating
Current Yield
1 Year Rate / Yield
5 Year Rate / Yield
Low Risk
 
 
 
 
Commonwealth Government Bond
AAA
-
2.77%
2.70%
Term Deposit Westpac
AA-
-
4.35%
4.65%
Term Deposit NAB
AA-
-
4.40%
4.60%
Listed / Hybrid
 
 
 
 
NAB Income Securities
BBB+
6.33%
-
-
Macquarie Income Securities
BBB-
7.66%
-
-
Shares - Forecast June 13 Grossed up Annual Dividends*
 
 
 
 
ASX
-
8.59%
-
-
Telstra
-
9.41%
-
-
Westpac
-
10.03%
-
-
NAB
-
11.26%
-
-
Source: Bloomberg, Bank Web Sites, RBS, Perennial Value. Forecast Gross Dividends for Financial Year ending 30 June 2013.
*Forecast return from June 2012 - June 2013.

Peter sold his property in 2010 as he anticipated correctly falls in house prices. He commented that his current rental property has dropped by 125,000 since he has moved in there. He has ‘no intention to own property again’ due to its costs & maintenance demands. ‘Rich Dad’ & others would agree with him.

We suggested that Peter consider a different allocation of his 1,000,000. I.e. not all 100% cash.

But into what & this means answering the what ifs.

There are too many what ifs & hence defining & countering these what if defines how his 1,000,000 is allocated.

Let’s not forget the what if of living too long. At the age of 52 then Peter could run out of capital & relaying on the government is not where anyone wants to go.

Peter  also commented on current Chinese thinking. I.e. all Westerners are from USA & Peter used the word ‘despise’ as the  Chinese attitude.  That certainly surprised us. He also pointed out the current indoctrination of the younger generation on Japan & how a Beijing  museum is being renovated to prove their arguments. That is a serious what if. That is completely different from the National Museum in Taipei.

{ This disagrees with an economist Jonathan Pain who correctly forecast the CFG in 2007 & his expectations this week on China  in 2013.} Email us for his article.

We also attended another seminar with Matt Sherwood  from Perpetual who manage 24 billion.

He compared the 5 asset classes i.e. cash, gold, property, listed property ,equities ..

Over any 20 year period equities produced 157 times the initial capital  using growth & income.

Cash produced only 25 times the original capital

LPT produced 78 times more.

Gold was the worst with 12 times as it didn’t provide an income & arguably therefore not an asset.

Residential property was 44 times the original capital.

Here is another what if. We read the Chinese want to own all the gold in 2020. Why? They want to be recognised as a reserve currency.

Many fund managers have an allocation between 5% & 10% gold. Why? It is Insurance.

Peter might view Matt’s  summary of the new investing environment as having 5 long term trends.

1.       Debt reduction

2.       Demographic  changes

3.       Energy consumers & producers changing

4.       Productivity & technical innovation

5.       Emergence of the BRICs

Hence the markets will be dominated by these long term trends

1.       Downsizing earning risk in advanced economies

2.       Decline in valuations

3.       Depreciating commodity prices.

4.       Emergence of income investing as source of wealth creation.

5.       Risk & return dynamics to change.

Matt is saying as the world has changed & hence the old rules which have worked in the past have changed.

Bill Gross from PIMCO does call it the ‘New Normal’.

Peter has plenty of what ifs & the answer is asset allocation. However his asset allocation must fit his view of the world which is his ‘risk profile’.  He can weigh his assets in the portfolio in many ways. Our suggestions is to tailor a model portfolio of fund managers from asset managers according to his currently very conservative profile.

 Of course term deposits & direct shares & most suggestions from Peter are available under the one umbrella which provides wholesale products & sophisticated record keeping.

An alternative is to use a specialist fund of fund managers after taking Peter’s risk profile into consideration.

We could discuss the Yale & Harvard endowment models & note from an email today  During the past 10 years through 2009, including the crash, Yale's endowment managed average annual returns of 11.7%, allowing its endowment to reach $16 billion. That put Yale ahead of the top-performing U.S. mutual fund of the decade’.

Once you look under the hood, it's a relatively straightforward strategy of diversifying beyond a standard U.S. stock and bond portfolio into a broader range of asset classes like timber, private equity, real estate and global stocks and bonds.

 We just received this viewpoint via ‘Sovereign man’

a cockroach's portfolio "would be inflation resistant, deflation resistant, credit inflation resistant, credit deflation resistant... despite having 'no view' on which scenario was more likely at any one point in time." In short, a generalist approach.

It should be clear to any longstanding readers that we nurse grave fears for the future. So we have, at least, two choices--

We can vote in favour of the asset specialists who, putting the wrong end of the telescope to a blind eye, suggest that there are no problems ahead, and no bubbles visible.

Or we can vote in favour of a somewhat generalist strategy that allocates to a diversified array of disparate asset types (creditworthy bonds, defensive equities, real assets, uncorrelated funds) and that then attempts to pick value in those dusty, neglected corners where it might exist.

We are more worried about risk than we are greedy for return. And if that makes us cockroaches, we can certainly live with the label.

 Yep that means fees but we certainly don’t want to look after our money 24 / 7/ 365. It’s a stress which we would rather pass on. He can do it himself  but we only master any trade after 20,000 hours.

Peter at some stage needs to act which is why he called us on 07 3848 1088. You may also email us.

 
John McAuliffe